Image by feyip via Flickr
I’m not one of the privileged few who have a pre-release copy of Rob Bell’s forthcoming book Love Wins. However, I have been reading and discussing with a local group of pastors Bell’s Jesus Wants to Save Christians. I couldn’t agree more with Carl Truman’s recent post critiquing the way Bell and others construct their arguments:
Popular books written for popular consumption are vital in the church; and Bell is to be commended for seeing that need. Further, when such books simply put forth an unexceptionable position, there is no real necessity for any scholarly apparatus; but when they self-consciously present themselves as arguing for significant or controversial paradigm shifts, the author really does need to cite sources. This is crucial because such citation allows the reader to engage in a conversation with the matter at hand. Indeed, the failure to do so actually prevents the reader from checking such for herself. In short, such an author does theology by fiat, adopting a dictatorial and high-handed approach which precludes constructive dialogue, whatever “conversational” rhetoric the author may use to describe his intentions. The message is not one of dialogue; it is rather ‘Trust me: everyone else is wrong, though I am not going to give you the means to judge their arguments for yourselves.’ That kind of approach lacks any real critical or dialogical integrity.
via JT

No comments:
Post a Comment